Comments on: Ops or Security: Who’s Responsible for Securing Virtualization? http://www.tripwire.com/blog/security/ops-or-security-whos-responsible-for-securing-virtualization/ IT Security, Compliance and Best Practices Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:43:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Virtualization Security Blog http://www.tripwire.com/blog/security/ops-or-security-whos-responsible-for-securing-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Virtualization Security Blog Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:17:25 +0000 http://www.tripwire.org/blog/?p=51#comment-20 <strong>Who Will Own Virtualization And 10BASE-T Security?...</strong> Mark Gaydos wrote an article called “Ops or Security: Who’s Responsible for Securing Virtualization?” that hints at the virtualization survey results that we will be publishing next week, exploring how organizations are assigning responsibility for sec... Who Will Own Virtualization And 10BASE-T Security?…

Mark Gaydos wrote an article called “Ops or Security: Who’s Responsible for Securing Virtualization?” that hints at the virtualization survey results that we will be publishing next week, exploring how organizations are assigning responsibility for sec…

]]> By: Christofer Hoff http://www.tripwire.com/blog/security/ops-or-security-whos-responsible-for-securing-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Christofer Hoff Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:41:35 +0000 http://www.tripwire.org/blog/?p=51#comment-17 Methinks perhaps there is another possibility... http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/security-pros-s.html I summarize thusly: "I don't think it's that the security folks *want* to surrender the responsibility, I think it's that they never had it in the first place the moment the V-word entered the picture. It ain't rocket science. It ain't voodoo. It ain't a tectonic buck-passing conspiracy. It's access, separation of duties (by force,) visibility and capability, plain and simple." /Hoff Methinks perhaps there is another possibility…

http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/06/security-pros-s.html

I summarize thusly:

“I don’t think it’s that the security folks *want* to surrender the responsibility, I think
it’s that they never had it in the first place the moment the V-word entered the
picture.

It ain’t rocket science. It ain’t voodoo. It ain’t a tectonic buck-passing conspiracy.
It’s access, separation of duties (by force,) visibility and capability, plain and simple.”

/Hoff

]]>